Occupational Color Vision Test Requirements Database
One resource. Every career. Every test. This database consolidates color vision test requirements across 40+ careers, 13+ test types, and 10+ regulatory bodies — from the FAA and NFPA to POST commissions and the UK CAA. Whether you’re an aspiring pilot, a police recruit, a nurse, or a career counselor, find the exact threshold you need.
Last updated: October 9, 2026 · Data verified against official regulatory sources
How to Use This Database
- Select your career category from the Career dropdown — Aviation, Law Enforcement, Fire & EMS, Electrical Trades, Transportation, Military, or Medical.
- Filter by test type if you know which test your employer uses (Ishihara, CAD, FALANT, etc.).
- Choose a regulatory body to see requirements from a specific agency (FAA, NFPA, POST, etc.).
- Use the search bar to find specific careers, thresholds, or keywords across all entries.
- Click any column header to sort — for example, sort by “Pass Threshold” to find the strictest requirements.
- Click the source link in each row to verify the data directly from the regulatory body’s official publication.
⬇️ The interactive table below contains all 45 entries. Use the filters to narrow down by your career.
Browse the Database
| Career | Category | Test(s) Used | Pass Threshold | Regulatory Body | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot (ATP/Commercial) — FAA Airline transport & commercial pilots | Aviation | CAD RCCT Waggoner CCVT |
CAD: RG ≤1.7 (normal) / <6 (Deutan) / <12 (Protan) + YB <2.4 RCCT: ≥55 for each color (R, G, B) Waggoner CCVT: General ≥21/25 + Tritan ≥10/12, or Protan ≥20/32 + Deutan ≥20/32 + Tritan ≥10/12 No limit on attempts — you may try all three tests. Color-correcting lenses are prohibited during testing. On failure the AME may issue limitation #104 (day VFR only); SODA, OCVT and Medical Flight Test pathways remain available |
FAA / AME | FAA.gov |
| Pilot (Private/Recreational) — FAA Private pilot certificate | Aviation | CAD RCCT Waggoner CCVT | Same as ATP/Commercial thresholds | FAA / AME | FAA.gov |
| Pilot — UK CAA Professional flight crew (Class 1 & 2) | International | Ishihara CAD Anomaloscopy |
Ishihara 24-plate: 15/15 correct (first 15 plates, 0 errors) If fail → CAD: RG <6 (Deutan) or <12 (Protan) Anomaloscopy: Midpoint 38–42, range ≤4 Tritan: >2 SU suggests an acquired cause and should be investigated ⚠️ Lantern tests no longer accepted |
UK CAA | CAA.co.uk |
| Air Traffic Controller — FAA ATC specialist (2152 series) | Aviation | CAD RCCT Waggoner Ishihara | Same test thresholds as pilots; no SODA/operational test pathway — normal color vision required | FAA | FAA ATCS Tests |
| Aircraft Maintenance Technician AME / repair station personnel | Aviation | Ishihara | Varies by employer — typically 10/14 on 14-plate; some accept Farnsworth D-15 | Employer-Dependent | Employer-specific |
| Police Officer — New York State Municipal police, sheriffs, NYSP | Law Enforcement | Ishihara 24-plate | 9/13 correct minimum (first 13 plates); Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue optional retest (score ≤124). Corrective lenses may not be used to meet the standard. 📌 Legislation stalled: NY S04389 passed the Senate (May 2026) but remained in the Assembly Governmental Employees Committee when the 2025–2026 session adjourned sine die — it did not become law, and the bill does not carry over. The 9/13 standard remains in effect. A comparable 2024 bill was vetoed. View bill → |
NYS DCJS | 9 NYCRR § 6000.7 |
| Police Officer — Michigan (MCOLES) Local & state law enforcement | Law Enforcement | Ishihara | Evaluated by examining physician per MCOLES medical standards; no fixed numeric threshold published | MCOLES | MI Admin Code R 28.14204 |
| Police Officer — California (POST) Municipal & county law enforcement | Law Enforcement | Ishihara Farnsworth D-15 | Typically 10/14 to 12/14 (Ishihara); some departments accept D-15 (no crossings) as alternative | CA POST | CA POST |
| Police Officer — Pennsylvania (MPOETC) Municipal police | Law Enforcement | Ishihara Farnsworth | “Normal depth and color perception” required — but no numeric plate score is set. Form MPO-211 asks the examiner to record normal colour perception using the Farnsworth or Ishihara test. A federal appeals court held in Lekich v. Pawlowski (3d Cir. 2010) that colour vision deficiency is not a disability requiring accommodation under the ADA | PA MPOETC | 37 Pa. Code § 203.11 |
| Police Officer — Texas (TCOLE) Municipal & county agencies | Law Enforcement | No test named | No color-vision standard in state rule. The physician must certify the applicant is “physically sound and free from any defect which may adversely affect the performance of duty” (37 TAC § 217.1) — colour vision is not mentioned. Individual departments may add stricter rules; some specify “free of dichromatic color blindness” | TCOLE | 37 TAC § 217.1 |
| Police Officer — Florida (CJSTC) Municipal & county agencies | Law Enforcement | Physician assessment | No numeric threshold. Rule 11B-27.002 requires a physician’s assessment (Form CJSTC-75/75A) that records “Color Perception” as normal or abnormal. No test is named and no pass mark is set — the decision is the examining physician’s clinical judgement | FL CJSTC | Rule 11B-27.002 |
| Police Officer — Illinois (ILETSB) Municipal agencies | Law Enforcement | No state standard | No statewide color-vision standard. ILETSB rules (20 Ill. Adm. Code 1720) cover training and physical fitness only. Colour vision is set locally by municipal Boards of Fire & Police Commissioners, and the wording varies widely — from “shall not be color blind” to expressly permitting mild anomalous trichromatism | Local Boards | 20 Ill. Adm. Code 1720 |
| Police Officer — Ohio (OPOTC) Municipal agencies | Law Enforcement | No state standard | No statewide color-vision standard. Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 109:2 contains no vision rule; OAC 109:2-1-04 merely lets academies optionally require a physical examination. Standards are set by individual agencies, which commonly advertise “corrected to 20/20 and no color blindness” | Local Agencies | OAC 109:2-1-04 |
| Police Officer — General (Other States) Individual state POST commissions | Law Enforcement | Ishihara OPTEC/Titmus | Varies widely — from a defined Ishihara threshold (e.g. 9/13 in New York) to no color-vision standard at all. A 2024 MCOLES review of 50 state-level agencies found 33 had no color-vision standard, 14 had one, and 3 did not respond. Check your state POST commission | State POST | State-specific |
| State Trooper / Highway Patrol Enforcement agency-specific | Law Enforcement | Ishihara | Varies by state — often stricter than municipal police. Examples: Tennessee THP, Texas DPS | State Agency | Agency-specific |
| FBI / Federal Agent DOJ law enforcement | Law Enforcement | Ishihara | Strict — typically normal color vision required; field test may follow Ishihara failure | DOJ / FBI | Agency-specific |
| Correctional Officer State & federal corrections | Law Enforcement | Ishihara OPTEC | Generally less strict than patrol officers; varies by state DOC | State/Federal | State-specific |
| Firefighter — NFPA 1582 Structural fire suppression (career & volunteer) | Fire & EMS | Ishihara Farnsworth D-15 Waggoner CCVT |
Standard: “Sufficient colour perception to safely perform all essential job tasks” — NFPA 1582 does not mandate a specific test or a numeric pass mark Red-green deficiency: does not automatically disqualify — reviewed case by case against the 13 essential job tasks Category A disqualifier: monochromatic vision where it prevents use of imaging devices such as thermal cameras Typical department pipeline: Ishihara screening → if failed, Farnsworth D-15 or Waggoner CCVT for a functional ruling |
NFPA | NFPA 1582 |
| Firefighter — Canada Municipal fire departments | Fire & EMS | Ishihara 14-plate | Typically 10/14; some departments accept alternative testing | Local/Provincial | FireComm MB |
| EMT / Paramedic Emergency medical services | Fire & EMS | Ishihara OPTEC | Varies by state — some require normal, others accept mild deficiency; typically less strict than fire suppression | State EMS | State-specific |
| Electrician — General Residential & commercial | Electrical | Ishihara |
OSHA: No color vision standard — explicitly stated (2004) Some JIB apprenticeships test; ADA accommodations apply Color filters, multimeters, and numbered ferrules used as accommodations |
OSHA / Employer | OSHA Letter |
| Lineman / Power Line Worker Utility transmission & distribution | Electrical | Ishihara | Varies by utility — some require normal, others accept accommodations; railway/defense sectors stricter | Utility / Union | Employer-specific |
| Electrical Engineer Design, consulting, project management | Electrical | Rarely tested | No standard occupational requirement; employer-dependent | Employer-Dependent | — |
| Electronics Technician Repair, manufacturing, field service | Electrical | Ishihara | Employer-dependent; color-coded components may require accommodation | Employer-Dependent | Employer-specific |
| Commercial Driver (CDL) — Interstate Truck, bus, hazmat | Transportation | Color Recognition | Must distinguish red, green, and amber traffic signals; no fixed Ishihara number. Partial red-green deficiency is generally acceptable — the screening tests recognition of signal colours, not clinical colour perception. There is no colour-vision exemption: the Alternative Vision Standard (§ 391.44) covers visual acuity and field of vision only. In Feb 2026 the FMCSA removed the already-expired § 391.64(b) grandfathering provision — housekeeping only, no change for current drivers | FMCSA / DOT | 49 CFR § 391.41 / § 391.44 |
| Train Conductor / Locomotive Engineer Freight & passenger rail | Transportation | Ishihara Light Cannon | Strict — must recognise and distinguish railroad signal colours. Appendix D sets failure criteria (e.g. Ishihara 14-plate: 2+ errors on plates 1–11; Dvorine: 3+ errors on plates 1–15; OPTEC 2000 / Titmus: any error). No chromatic lenses permitted on an initial test. Under § 242.117(j) a person who fails may request further medical evaluation by the railroad’s medical examiner, who may still certify them with restrictions | FRA | 49 CFR § 242.117 + App. D |
| Mariner (Deck) — USCG Merchant marine, STCW watchkeeping | Transportation | Ishihara FALANT D-15 Titmus/OPTEC | “Satisfactory” result on any approved test: Ishihara (14-, 24- or 38-plate), Dvorine (2nd ed.), AOC / AOC-HRR, Farnsworth Lantern, Titmus Vision Tester, OPTEC 2000, Optec 900, or Richmond (2nd/4th ed.). No color-sensing or color-correcting lenses permitted. On renewal, a mariner who fails may request an operational colour vision test aboard the vessel (passing may limit them to that vessel) | USCG | 46 CFR § 10.305 |
| Mariner (Engine) — USCG Engineering, tankerman, MODU | Transportation | Farnsworth D-15 | Must distinguish red, green, blue, and yellow; D-15 accepted (no crossings) | USCG | 46 CFR § 10.305 |
| Maritime Watchkeeper — UK Bridge watchkeeping (MCA) | International | CAD | ≤2.35 CAD units — stricter than aviation threshold; reflects greater color discrimination demands of bridge watchkeeping | UK MCA | RSSB Research |
| Bus Driver (City Transit) Municipal transit authorities | Transportation | Color Recognition | Same CDL standard: distinguish red, green, amber; some transit authorities add Ishihara screening | State / Transit | Agency-specific |
| School Bus Driver CDL with S & P endorsements | Transportation | Color Recognition | Same FMCSA CDL standard: must distinguish red, green, and amber; tested via Snellen chart color lines + yellow object; some states add stricter local requirements | FMCSA / State | 49 CFR § 391.41 / § 391.44 |
| Taxi / Rideshare Driver (Non-CDL) Uber, Lyft, taxi, limo | Transportation | Not tested | No color vision requirement — operates under standard (Class D) driver’s license; no CDL or DOT physical required. Rideshare platforms (Uber, Lyft) do not test color vision | State DMV | No federal standard |
| Delivery / Courier Driver (Non-CDL) Amazon DSP, UPS, FedEx, food delivery | Transportation | Rarely tested | No color vision requirement for non-CDL delivery roles; some employer-specific screening may exist; DOT physical only required for vehicles over 10,000 lbs GVWR | Employer-Dependent | Employer-specific |
| Enlistment — Army General enlistment | Military | Ishihara Rabin CCT | Ishihara/PIP: 12/14 = “normal”; combat arms need red/green discrimination only. FALANT is retired — no longer accepted for new applicants; secondary testing uses the Rabin Cone Contrast Test (≥55 per cone type) or Waggoner CCVT | DoD / MEPS | DoDI 6130.03 |
| Enlistment — Navy General ratings | Military | Ishihara Rabin CCT | Ishihara screening → Rabin Cone Contrast Test (≥55 per cone type) or Waggoner CCVT for confirmation. FALANT is retired — not accepted for new applicants. Closed to CVD: ATC, UAV, sonar, aviation | DoD / MEPS | DoDI 6130.03 |
| Enlistment — Air Force General enlistment | Military | Ishihara | Ishihara → CCT if needed; strictest for aviation roles — pilot, navigator, ATC require normal color vision | DoD / MEPS | DoDI 6130.03 |
| Enlistment — Marine Corps General enlistment | Military | Ishihara Rabin CCT | Similar to Army; combat MOSs require normal color vision; waivers possible but difficult. FALANT is retired — secondary testing via Rabin Cone Contrast Test or Waggoner CCVT | DoD / MEPS | DoDI 6130.03 |
| Enlistment — Coast Guard General enlistment | Military | Ishihara | Strictest branch: any CVD is disqualifying for general enlistment; waivers extremely rare | USCG | USCG medical standards |
| Special Operations / Aviation / ATC All branches (SOF, pilot, aircrew) | Military | Ishihara CAD | Normal color vision required; CAD ≤6.0 SNU for special duty; waivers rare for safety-critical roles | DoD (Branch-Specific) | Branch-specific memorandums |
| Medical School — US/Canada MD, DO programs | Medical | Varies by program | No universal ban — case-by-case assessment; surgical/pathology/radiology specialties most affected. Accommodations possible | AAMC / School | School-specific |
| Surgeon General & surgical specialties | Medical | Case-by-case | High color discrimination needed for tissue identification; residency credentialing evaluates on individual basis | Hospital / Board | Credentialing-specific |
| Pharmacist Retail, clinical, hospital | Medical | Rarely tested | No formal color vision requirement at most schools or state boards | School / Board | Program-specific |
| Dentist DDS, DMD | Medical | Varies | Some dental schools test, few ban outright; shade matching for restorations may require accommodation | School / Board | School-specific |
| Nurse (RN / LPN) Hospital, clinical, long-term care | Medical | Ishihara | No universal requirement — most nursing schools evaluate case-by-case; color discrimination important for medication ID, lab results, skin assessment. Some hospitals test; ADA accommodations apply | School / Employer | Program-specific |
| Lab Technician / Phlebotomist Clinical laboratory, blood banking | Medical | Ishihara | Some employers require color discrimination for reagent testing, result interpretation; varies widely | Employer-Dependent | Employer-specific |
📋 Notes & Caveats
- Data currency: This database was last updated October 9, 2026. Regulatory standards change — always verify with the official source.
- Employer vs. regulatory: The thresholds shown are regulatory minimums. Individual employers, departments, training programs, or unions may impose stricter requirements.
- State police variation: Each state sets its own standards — and many set none at all. We now document NY, MI, CA, PA, TX, FL, IL and OH. A 2024 MCOLES review of 50 state-level agencies found 33 had no colour-vision standard, 14 had one, and 3 did not respond. If your state isn’t listed, check your state POST website.
- Departments can be stricter than the state: Where a state sets no colour-vision standard (Texas, Florida, Illinois and Ohio, for example), the hiring agency very often fills the gap — common requirements include “no colour blindness” or “colour vision within normal ranges.” Always check the specific department, not just the state POST commission.
- Color-correcting lenses: Some regulatory bodies explicitly prohibit color-correcting glasses or contacts during testing (FAA: no X-Chrom; USCG: no color-sensing lenses). Consult your examiner before testing with any corrective device.
- About the FAA 2025 change: The Jan 1, 2025 mandate applies to new pilot applicants. Previously certified pilots are grandfathered. ATCS standards remain unchanged.
- Data quality: Some entries show specific, verified thresholds (e.g., “9/13” for NY police). Others show general guidance where no universal standard exists (e.g., “varies by employer”). We mark general entries as employer-dependent or state-specific.
- Medical field: Unlike other career categories, medical color vision requirements are enforced at the specialty/residency level rather than through a standardized test threshold. The information here is directional.
- FALANT retirement: The Farnsworth Lantern (FALANT) has been retired by the U.S. military — the Navy stopped accepting it for new applicants on 1 January 2017 and the other services have moved to computerized testing. It still appears in older documents and remains named in the USCG regulation at 46 CFR § 10.305, so treat any FALANT reference as legacy rather than current.
- NFPA 1582 at a glance: The standard asks for “sufficient colour perception to safely perform all essential job tasks.” Red-green deficiency is assessed case by case (Category B); only monochromatic vision that prevents use of imaging devices such as thermal cameras is a Category A disqualifier.
- Military standards: DoDI 6130.03-V1 sets no single color vision rule — it delegates to the individual service components (Change 6, February 3, 2026). Color vision deficiencies are waiverable in most branches under DoDMERB code D156.10; the Coast Guard has no waiver pathway.
- Railroad testing: FRA conductor color vision standards sit in 49 CFR § 242.117 with Appendix D. Failing the initial test is not necessarily final — § 242.117(j) allows further medical evaluation by the railroad’s medical examiner, who may still certify the person with restrictions.
Frequently Asked Questions About Occupational Color Vision Tests
What color vision test do I need to pass to become a pilot?
As of January 1, 2025, FAA pilot applicants must pass one of three computer-based tests: the CAD test (RG ≤1.7 for normal color vision), the Rabin Cone Contrast Test (score ≥55 for each color), or the Waggoner CCVT (General ≥21/25 + Tritan ≥10/12). The paper Ishihara test is no longer accepted for new pilot applicants. Existing pilots who previously passed any FAA-approved test are grandfathered. See the Aviation section above for full thresholds.
Can you be a nurse with color blindness?
Yes, in most cases. There is no universal ban on colorblind nurses in the US. Nursing schools evaluate on a case-by-case basis, and some hospitals may test. Color discrimination is important for medication identification, lab result interpretation, and skin assessment, but accommodations (labeling systems, color-assist tools, asking colleagues to verify) typically apply. The nursing color vision guide covers this in depth.
Can I be a police officer with color blindness?
It depends on your state — and many states set no colour-vision standard at all. New York requires a minimum of 9/13 correct on the Ishihara 24-plate (9 NYCRR § 6000.7) and Pennsylvania requires “normal depth and color perception” (37 Pa. Code § 203.11), while Texas, Florida, Illinois and Ohio leave it to the examining physician or the local agency. California POST typically requires 10/14 to 12/14 and Michigan MCOLES evaluates case by case. A 2024 review of 50 state-level agencies found 33 had no colour-vision standard. Where the state is silent, the hiring department usually fills the gap, so check both.
Can colorblind people become electricians?
Yes. OSHA has explicitly stated it has no color vision standard for electricians (2004 interpretation letter). Many colorblind electricians work successfully using practical accommodations: color filters, multimeters for verification, numbered ferrule systems, and documented wire labeling. Some JIB apprenticeship programs may test, but the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires reasonable accommodations.
Does the DOT have color vision requirements for CDL drivers?
The FMCSA requires commercial drivers to be able to distinguish red, green, and amber traffic signals (49 CFR § 391.41/§ 391.44). There is no fixed Ishihara number. If you cannot pass the color recognition screening, an FMCSA Vision Exemption is available — the process takes 180–240 days and the exemption is valid for 2 years with annual medical exams required. A minor 2026 rule change removed an obsolete grandfathering provision but did not change the current standard.
Is New York changing its police color vision requirements?
Not right now — the bill stalled. NY S04389 passed the Senate in May 2026 but was still sitting in the Assembly Governmental Employees Committee when the 2025–2026 session adjourned sine die. It did not become law, and New York bills do not carry over between two-year terms, so it would have to be reintroduced from scratch. The current standard therefore remains 9/13 on the Ishihara 24-plate. This was the second attempt — a similar 2024 bill (S6162) was vetoed by Gov. Hochul in November 2024.
What was the FAA 2025 color vision testing change?
Effective January 1, 2025, the FAA replaced the traditional paper Ishihara plate test with computer-based color vision testing (CAD, Rabin Cone Contrast Test, or Waggoner CCVT) for all new pilot applicants. This change was driven by concerns over test standardization, fading paper plates, memorization, and the increasing prevalence of color displays in cockpits. Previously certified pilots who passed any prior FAA-approved test are grandfathered and do not need to retest.
Which military branch is strictest about color blindness?
The Coast Guard is the strictest — any color vision deficiency is disqualifying for general enlistment, and there is no waiver pathway. The Army is the most flexible: combat arms roles require only red/green discrimination. The Air Force is strictest for aviation roles (pilots, navigators, ATC require normal color vision). Navy and Marine Corps fall in between. Since the retirement of the FALANT lantern test, secondary testing uses the Rabin Cone Contrast Test (≥55 per cone type) or Waggoner CCVT, and most colour vision deficiencies are waiverable — the Coast Guard being the exception.
Can you be a firefighter with color blindness?
Yes, in most cases. NFPA 1582 requires only “sufficient colour perception to safely perform all essential job tasks” and does not mandate a specific test or numeric pass mark. Red-green colour deficiency is not automatically disqualifying — it is assessed case by case against the 13 essential job tasks. Only monochromatic vision that prevents use of imaging devices such as thermal cameras is a Category A disqualifier. Departments commonly screen with Ishihara and fall back to the Farnsworth D-15 or Waggoner CCVT if it is failed; mild deficiencies that pass the D-15 are generally cleared. Note that individual departments set their own requirements, and military firefighter roles are stricter.